Friday, July 24, 2009

Training: Universal Technology Transfer Methodologies for Biopharmaceuticals




Stephen M. Perry, PMP and Vladimir Kostyukovsky, Ph.D. of Kymanox will be teaching the course next week, July 27-28, 2009, 8:30 AM – 4:30 PM at NC State BTEC.


The Midwest office is excited to see another round of training coming up at BTEC and know how value-added the training will be for all who attend.







Universal Technology Transfer Methodologies for Biopharmaceuticals Course Description:

Discover how to set-up a team of professionals essential for the success of tech transfer. Assess feasibility, business, and regulatory impact. Identify necessary actions and create detailed assay and process transfer plans. Monitor, evaluate progress, and manage proactively the ongoing technology transfer project. Define criteria and document success of the technology transfer. Defend the rationale for and the outcome of the transfer in front of US and international regulatory bodies.


Best regards,


Justin Pawlik

Friday, July 17, 2009

Project Management in Drug Development: Phase III to Commercialization and Beyond



I attended the two day training last week from 20JUL09 - 21 JUL09 provided by Stephen M. Perry, President of Kymanox at NC State BTEC and was extremely impressed. The course was yet another example of how Kymanox provides Ideal Knowledge Transfer (IKT).


As a new drug candidate enters late‐stage clinical development, project managers must shift their focus from development to preparing to enter the marketplace. A few of the challenges associated with Phase III and Commercialization include regulatory submission, manufacturing scale‐up, and promotional launch. In order to successfully transfer from Phase III to Commercialization, project managers must learn how to apply the fundamentals of cross‐functional project management to these later stages of drug development. Particular skills are needed to effectively implement, monitor, and control late stage projects. By following the procedures and using the tools and templates provided, this course will allow you to successfully manage late‐stage drug development projects and avoid costly delays during the shift from Phase III to Commercialization.



The course was intense and very informative. Upon completion I was able to:


  • Select the right cross‐functional team to ensure project success

  • Effectively communicate with internal and external stakeholders and prevent communication breakdowns

  • Develop useful project objectives and project plans

  • Apply risk management strategies when developing project objectives and making risk‐based decisions

  • Create and manage an achievable timeline and budget

  • Successfully transition from Phase III to commercialization and avoid costly delays

I definitely recommend the training and am looking forward to the next topic on Universal Technology Transfer Methodologies for Biopharmaceuticals which will also be at BTEC on 27-28JUL09.


Please feel free to contact me with any additions, comments, or questions.


Best regards,

Justin Pawlik

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

GMPPENS | cGMP Compliant Indelible Ink

There has been quite a bit of buzz surrounding GMP pens lately. Companies are looking for a way to easily identify and use pens that are GMP compliant. This saves time and money by reducing the amount of exception reports caused by improper documentation techniques. Kymanox offers a solution... GMPPENS!



One concern that comes up regularly is indelible ink and the resistance to alcohol especially 70% IPA. The rest of the industry shares this concern and frustration. GMPPENS are in fact cGMP compliant indelible ink as prescribed by the FDA. However, most alcohols (including 70% IPA) will smear "indelible ink" to some degree. It is highly recommended that companies approach the handling of the documents and use of the pens through training and awareness to reduce the exposure of 70% IPA to documents.

GMPPENS allow users in GMP environments to clearly identify and avoid using pencils, gel pens, erasable pens, etc. GMPPENS may be wiped down with 70% IPA for cleanroom and BSC use but the ink is subject to smearing with higher concentrations alcohol.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns regarding this issue. For additional information and ordering please visit http://www.gmppens.com/.




Best regards,

Justin Pawlik

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Management's Commitment to VMPs

Welcome back to the Kymanox Midwest Operations Blog.

My last post outlined the commitments made in Validation Master Plans. Of the three listed, the commitment from the management from the organization is one of the most important. This shows that management is dedicated to the outline of how and why validation must occur; it is also a reflection of the organization's values and objectives.

The Commitment from Management
A VMP, must first and foremost, contain a commitment to compliance and validation from the management of the organization. The overall commitment from management describes the organization’s values, global objectives, and global approaches for maintaining the validation quality system. Documenting this information is consistent with ICH Q7, Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, which states: “The company’s overall policy, intentions, and approach to validation….should be documented.” (1)

Management’s commitment to achieving compliance is a regulatory expectation which can be accomplished through an effective validation program. ICH Q10, Pharmaceutical Quality System (2), 21 CFR § 820.20 (3), and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001 (4) quality assurance model all refer to the need for a commitment from management in order to achieve compliance. The specific topics included in the policy section of a VMP form the management’s overall commitment to validation.

First, the VMP must broadly define the organization’s values with respect to validation. Just as a child’s values are developed from parents, so too are the values of employees developed from management. Defining the organization’s values regarding validation creates an environment where validation is viewed as an essential quality system. Validation is not simply an activity that is complete when all required tests on the systems have been executed and passed.

Outlining the organization’s values in the VMP is important because it describes the validation philosophy by which the organization operates and monitors its commitment to compliance and validation. Since the VMP is typically requested by inspectors prior to or during an audit, including this information in the VMP demonstrates management’s commitment to validation.

The VMP must also include management’s global objectives for validation. These objectives outline the goals for the validation program. Goals that are written down have a much higher probability of being achieved than those that are not. Goals for validation are no different. Including the objectives for validation in the VMP is a commitment to achieving those goals from the management of the organization.

In addition to including global objectives for validation, the VMP must include global approaches for ensuring that the validation program is both effective and accurate. Every system must be monitored and controlled after implementation to make certain that it continues to operate as intended. A frequency schedule for evaluating validation status shall be applied to each area based on criticality and quality risk. Including a plan for maintaining the validation program re-affirms management’s commitment to validation.

Any comments, questions, and suggestions are welcomed.


Best regards,


Justin Pawlik


REFERENCES
1. ICH, Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Q7, International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use 04 June 2008.

2. ICH, Pharmaceutical Quality System Q10, International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use 09 November 2005.

3. Quality System Regulation. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Volume 8, Part 820 1 April 2007.

4. ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management Systems—Requirements, Section 4.1.